Jump to Navigation

Covington Criminal Defense Law Blog

Judge Can Be Fair in OVI Cases

Judge Lyons, from the Butler County, Ohio, Area I Municipal Court can be fair and impartial despite the challenge from Assistant Butler County Prosecutor Donald Caster that he can't.  Part-time municipal court judges can also continue their private legal practice as long as they do not hear cases in which their firm or themselves represent a party.  However, like Judge Lyons, they can act as attorney of record for a defendant in a case from another County.  In that other County, the Judge is not acting as Judge, nor calling the shots; he is simply acting as a defendant's attorney while another Judge makes the calls. 

Prosecutor Caster is challenging Judge Lyons playing these duel roles in OVI/DUI cases.  Judge Lyons is acting as defense counsel in another County challenging the validity of the Intoxilyzer machines used in OVI/DUI cases to test a persons alcohol content (BAC).  In his own Court, the Judge is hearing cases from other attorney's dealing with the same issue.  This is not wrong, nor a conflict.  First, the Judge is not making judgment calls in the cases where he is the attorney, and he is not presenting the legal arguments in those cases where is acts as Judge. 

It appears the prosecutor is just unhappy with the rulings from the Judge.  Not winning, or not having judgments go in your favor, does not mean the Judge is acting inappropriate.  If the evidence is flawed or the testing methods are in error, accept it, don't blame it on the Judge.  I've practiced many times before Judge Lyons, he's fair and impartial, and makes well examined decisions in accordance with the law.  He is not the only Judge in Ohio who has heard and decided these same challenges in OVI/DUI cases.

Read the Article: http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20120308/NEWS/303080163/Prosecutor-wants-judge-off-OVI-cases

UNTOLD INFORMATION ON SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION

On Monday night I sat to watch the six o'clock news on Channel 9, WCPO. I-Team Investigates, with Brendan Keefe, presented a report on registered sex offenders living within 1,000 feet of schools.  I was shocked at what I  watched.  There information being presented was slanted and many important details were left out.  Without this important missing information, I would have been in fear of sex offenders living by schools just like most viewers were.  In reality, what the law permits and what the statistics really show are substantially different than what was portrayed.

See the report: www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/local-news/investigations/i-team-law-hasnt-stopped-sex-offenders-from-living-in-school-zones

Ohio State Senator Eric Kearney stated that many sex offenders re-offend.  While the re-offend part may be true, it left out that the new crimes committed by registrants may not be for sex offenses.  If a registered sex offender gets a DUI/OVI, a theft charge, or a host of other non-sex related crimes...those count as the registrant "re-offending."  This is important key that completely changes how the statistic appears.

The "loop-hole" that allows registered sex offenders the right to live within 1,000 feet of a school is not actually a "loop-hole," it's the United States and Ohio Constitutions.  If the offender has already been convicted and punished, the legislature cannot go back in time to impose additional or new punishments that did not previously exist.  This is the protection against Ex Post Facto Laws guaranteed by our Constitution; it prevents the legislature from criminalizing conduct from the past.  It just doesn't protect sex offenders, but protects everyone.  If we let legislative bodies impose these kinds of laws on sex offenders and violate their rights, then we open the door for them to pass similar laws on everyone else. Imagine getting a speeding ticket and paying your fine.  The next day the legislature passes a law that says all convicted speeders have to have GPS on their car and can only drive for work purposes.  You then get arrested because you, as a convicted speeder, drive to the movies and fail to install the GPS.  Is this fair or right?  Better yet, is it Constitutional?  This is an over simplified example of what occurs with sex offender laws.

It was refreshing to see the Clermont County Sheriff properly explain that residency laws don't really accomplish anything.  The offender can still sit at the park all day, while the park is open, as long as at night, when the park is closed, he sleeps 1,001 feet away.  In my brief to the Kentucky Supreme Court, and  later to the United States Supreme Court, I explained how residency restrictions are nothing more than political placebo laws.  The laws sound good but accomplish nothing.  See Commonwealth v. Baker, http://162.114.92.72/opinions/2007-SC-000347-CL.pdf.

The media and politicians use these fear tactics to promote agendas, ratings, and the passage of unconstitutional, useless legislation.  The public needs to be provided accurate and complete information to avoid misconceptions.

Welcome to Our Covington Criminal Defense Law Blog

We established this blog to share stories and information about topics relevant to our practice. Our intent is to highlight local stories, as well as national subject matter, that we think you will find interesting. We will regularly update this blog and encourage you to share your thoughts on these posts.

Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Subscribe to This Blog's Feed Visit Our Criminal Law Website

Office Location

Fox & Scott, P.L.L.C.
517 Madison Avenue
Covington, KY 41011
Telephone: 859-291-1000
Fax: 859-291-7306
Covington Law Office

513-591-2000 (in Cincinnati, OH)
859-291-1000 (in Covington, KY)

Privacy Policy | Legal Marketing by FindLaw, a Thomson Reuters business.